[ACCEPTED]-generate CPU load in Java-cpu
You could try something simple like
private static void spin(int milliseconds) {
long sleepTime = milliseconds*1000000L; // convert to nanoseconds
long startTime = System.nanoTime();
while ((System.nanoTime() - startTime) < sleepTime) {}
}
Test:
public static void main(String[] args) {
final int NUM_TESTS = 1000;
long start = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_TESTS; i++) {
spin(500);
}
System.out.println("Took " + (System.nanoTime()-start)/1000000 +
"ms (expected " + (NUM_TESTS*500) + ")");
}
My 3 output:
$ java SpinTest
Took 500023ms (expected 500000)
So the loop didn't get optimized 2 away (and yeah, I spiked my CPU to 100% for 1 eight minutes just to test this :)).
Encrypt a string (in a loop) by calling 6 Cipher.update(). Encryption algorithms 5 are by definition very difficult to optimize. The 4 only problem is that there is some non-trivial 3 setup you need to perform. I'm marking 2 this answer as community wiki, so that somebody 1 who's written it recently can fill it in.
Create a very large collection of random 3 objects and then alternate calls to Collections.shuffle()
and 2 Collections.sort()
.
I used Jakarta Commons Lang to generate 1 random strings for the purposes of shuffling/sorting.
Create a matrix and do a couple of matrix 2 manipulations.
You can tune that pretty easily 1 by varying the size of the matrix.
Yet another stuff you can use, maybe :
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
long count = 0l;
for(long x=0;x<Integer.MAX_VALUE ;x++){
count+=1;
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(end-start +" ms");
0
More Related questions
We use cookies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cookies.