[ACCEPTED]-string1 >= string2 not implemented in Linq to SQL, any workaround?-string-comparison

Accepted answer

Score: 30

If you're looking for => which would normally 7 be written as >= then you cannot do this directly 6 with strings. You can get the same behaviour 5 via CompareTo:

string1.CompareTo(string2) >= 0

In this case, the result being less 4 than or equal to zero means that string1 would 3 be sorted before string2 and therefore is greater.

FYI 2 the => operator in C# is only used in the 1 definition of lambda expressions.

Score: 8

string1 >= string2 is not supported in 7 C# Linq To Sql. The String class does not 6 override the >= operator at all. It 5 only overrides the != and == operators. You 4 can verify this by trying to compile the 3 following method

public static void Example() {
  int val = "foo" >= "bar";
}

If you want to compare to 2 Strings in LinqToSql you should be able 1 to use the static String.Compare(string,string) method.

Source: stackoverflow.com

[ACCEPTED]-string1 >= string2 not implemented in Linq to SQL, any workaround?-string-comparison

String.Equals vs String.Compare vs "==" in Action. Explanation needed

How to compare Unicode characters that "look alike"?

How Java String pool works when String concatenation?

Python: Why does ("hello" is "hello") evaluate as True?

C#: Confusion about ToUpper() and ToLower()

Compare versions as strings

Check if variable starts with 'http'

Best way to compare std::strings

In C#, what is the best way to compare strings with null and "" return true

Comparing two string in Java not giving the expected result